Your selected location:
28 Apr 2017

Fierce Fight for Domestic Violence Leave

Australian employees are already protected in their employment if they are experiencing domestic violence.  This is because the Fair Work Act 2010 makes it unlawful to terminate or otherwise adversely change an employee’s working conditions due to the fact that they are experiencing domestic violence. 

Prior to such protections some employers preferred to avoid the dangers of domestic violence becoming violence in the workplace and regretfully informed their employees that the risk of harm to other employees, or the reputation of the business was too great to continue to allow a victim of domestic violence to be at work. 

This reform to protect the employment of victims was necessary, and reflects Australia’s general commitment to ending the shame and silence that surrounds domestic violence so that victims are publicly supported and better equipped to seek safety from a private terror.

Now a further reform is sought – to provide additional paid leave to employees experiencing domestic violence so that they can take necessary actions such as going to court to apply for restraining orders, seek alternative accommodation, move children to another school and/or seek counselling and other treatment.

Paid Domestic Violence Leave

In 2014 the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) proposed that the Fair Work Commission (FWC) should insert a clause into all modern awards to provide for 10 days of paid domestic violence leave.

Employees experiencing domestic violence (or who are assisting a family member who is) would be eligible for such paid leave in addition to annual and personal leave entitlements guaranteed in the National Employment Standards.  It is not proposed that the leave would accrue or be paid out upon termination.

A separate proposal by the ACTU to allow employees to request a change in working arrangements in connection with their disclosure of domestic violence has also been proposed and is being considered in a separate application.

Extensive submissions in relation to the domestic violence leave proposal were received and considered by the Commission from a wide range of organisations including a multitude of unions as well as Industry Groups. 

Arguments For and Against

Unsurprisingly, submissions made by unions avidly supported the proposal while industry groups all said it would be too expensive and complicated to administer.

Issues about how employees would evidence domestic violence and requirements surrounding privacy, mandatory reporting and confidentiality were raised by some and effective solutions to these concerns were devised by others.  The proposed clause was amended numerous times as the application progressed.

There were other interesting points raised by stakeholders, including that Australia has international obligations to provide such leave versus other submissions that this kind of leave is not provided by most or even many other countries at this stage. 

It was also noted that special leave for those experiencing domestic violence is a bargaining chip in many enterprise agreement negotiations, and having it available as a potential benefit to be traded assisted successful conclusion of many agreements. 

Perhaps the most salient point though was the fact that a significant number of working Australians are not covered by a modern award.  This means the proposed clause would not assist victims of violence working under the Western Australian industrial relations system (for example) or in managerial or professional roles throughout the country.  This failure to cover the field is unacceptable where it is widely known that domestic violence affects people of all education levels and in all socio-economic groups. 

Critics of the proposed clause correctly asserted that the only way to ensure domestic violence leave is available to all workers would be to insert the clause into the National Employment Standards rather than into awards.  That change to legislation can only be made by the Australian Parliament.

Legal Technicality Causes Delay

After over two years of hearings the ACTU’s application has unfortunately fallen into a spiral of delay and controversy.  The President of the Fair Work Commission is now caught up in the matter and trying to determine a technical legal issue that could materially change whether the proposal succeeds or not.

One of the three original FWC decision makers resigned immediately after he handed down his decision (rejecting the proposal), while the two remaining Commissioners have yet to publish their decisions.  The President of the FWC must now determine whether the final two decisions can be handed down and the issue finalised, notwithstanding that the first decision maker is no longer available.  The alternative is that the first decision is disregarded and an alternative decision maker appointed.

There are almost as many submissions on this technical legal question as there were on the question of the proposal itself.  The ferocity of debate and vigorousness of the resistance to the change demonstrates what an emotionally charged issue this is.  A final decision still seems many months away.

Some Employers Already on Board

In the mean time, many organisations have taken the proposed clause and included it in their enterprise bargaining agreements or employment contracts – no doubt in a keen effort to demarcate themselves as proactive, progressive and compassionate employers.

The model clause that can be used is now very well honed and can be adapted to allow for more or less than 10 days leave.  Special provisions are included in the draft clause to assist with identifying how an employee can evidence domestic violence, and how organisations will ensure privacy, confidentiality and safety.

Will It Happen?

Some Australians are already receiving the benefit of being able to access domestic violence leave via inclusion of the entitlement in enterprise bargaining agreements or employment contracts.  This development should assist to gather data about how many people access the leave as a percentage of employees, how it is provided and used, the bottom line financial cost and the difference it makes to victims’ lives.  This kind of evidence may assist to convince other organisations to offer the benefit and could also cause Parliament to conclude that paid domestic violence leave is a benefit that should be legislated in the National Employment Standards so that it applies across the board to all Australians. 

There is a national commitment to ending the cycle of domestic violence in Australia.  Ensuring victims aren’t discouraged from seeking assistance because they will lose precious income is arguably an important part of that.  If the experiment some organisations are helpfully conducting proves that additional leave entitlements causes more victims to seek help then the question of how to do so really only boils down to ‘who should pay?’.

If offering the benefit proves to be too financially burdensome for some or all businesses, the Australian Government may need to consider whether it could partially reimburse employers, loan money to victims or fund domestic violence leave in a similar way to paid parental leave.

This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. If you would like further information in relation to this matter or other legal matters please contact our offices on Freecall 1800 609 945 or email us now.

*This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. Please consult one of our experienced Legal Team for specific advice relevant to your situation.

Supporting Western Australians for more than 100 years

"Always fast and thorough service. Thank you"

Sitka Pil

My circumstances at the time I made contact with HHG were dire following my argument being rejected by two no win no fee firms. Following my initial meeting with HHG's employment law team I was left feeling extremely positive by the response and concern shown by HHG in regards to their support of my argument along with their preparedness to pursue an outcome on my behalf.

I accept the fact that nobody really wins in these cases (mental health/ workplace) however the end result was what would be considered most favourable and far in excess of what would have been achieved had I not sought the advice from HHG.

I have no hesitation in recommending HHG to anyone caught up in the messy circumstances I found myself in at the time.

Great advice and five-star commitment to their client!!"

Nathan Lynch

"Thank you for such great assistance with the transaction of Flying Domestics on behalf of Lorna Good. It has been such a pleasure to work with the HHG Legal Group and I look forward to working with you in the future."

Jim Goodwin

"Simon Creek and his team were at all times empathic, professional and confident.  My matter needed to be addressed within a pressing time frame, and their availability at short notice and contact after hours was much appreciated.  It caused me considerable stress, but having such a thoroughly reliable and competent team to call on helped me to feel in control. Although I hope not to need their services again in future, I would be confident in doing so!"

Dr Lana Bell

"A good outcome is what we can expect.  A great outcome is a sign of a company which does the very best for their clients. A very big thank you to Daniel Morris for showing empathy towards my small and much needed legal action.

To HHG Legal Group, thank you for a great outcome.  I would recommend your company to anyone seeking legal services."

Jan Atkinson

"Your support this morning was amazingly kind, not to mention your totally reassuring competence, knowledge and wisdom that you used on my behalf.  It was extremely reassuring to have your knowledgeable support, and I particularly appreciated your real and obvious kindness to me. It means so much at a very difficult time. I'm so grateful to you."

Family Law Client

"Janene was very professional and we established a good rapport quickly. The subject of death and wills can be quite confronting to deal with, however, Janene's approach was soft and accommodating."

Lynette Livesey

"A big thank you to HHG for their professional service, continued support, and wide range of legal knowledge. Our clients have given us nothing but kind words regarding HHG Legal Group and so we have no hesitation in referring and recommending Simon Creek and HHG Legal Group for their outstanding services and legal expertise."

Nigel Plowman, Director at McKinley Plowman & Associates

"Simon is a friendly and practical legal advisor. I have received great feedback from the clients I have referred to him and his team at HHG Legal Group."

Richard Beal, Director at BDO

"Over the last few years, I have been impressed by Simon’s legal ability, management skills, entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity and people skills. He appears to be that rare breed of lawyer – both knowledgeable and commercial."

Michael Malone, Founder of iiNet

"Our family has been a client of HHG Legal Group over many years.  Business has included drawing up of wills for three generations and preparing of probate for my father in law. I would have no hesitation in recommending HHG Legal Group to anyone requiring such services."

Bernice Climie

"You should be congratulated for the manner in which your staff address clients and we found our dealings with your company, once again a very pleasant experience and we would like to truly thank you for your efforts."

Steve Harvey and Jane Powell

"HHG Legal were absolutely fantastic. Extremely responsive and brought calm to our chaotic family situation through their knowledge and caring attitude. Extremely professional from our very first contact with them and they expertly guided our family though the required legal process over almost a 12 month period."

Amanda Williamson

"Fantastic team! They really care about their client. Tim Colcutt is a 'go that extra mile' guy who gives his client his all. I can't recommend HHG and Tim enough."

Kerry Samson

"I had a fantastic lawyer in Anne Hurley. She helped me out a great deal with good, sound advice in a friendly, professional manner. First class, thanks Anne"

Graeme Hammond

"Marine Plant Systems has been working with HHG Legal Group for a few years now and they continually provide first-class service. Their professional advice has been invaluable to our company."

Carolin Grimm - Marine Plant Systems

"We were kept up to date at all times. Pricing was always updated over the time period so we remained "in budget". Personal access to someone whenever I had questions. All in all a great experience without too much fuss."

Rosslyn Tasker - COO AltusQ Pty Ltd

"Good service you can count on."

Miles Lee

"HHG Legal Group has provided outstanding support as I have taken the journey of buying a business, their professionalism is beyond reproach. Their assistance throughout the Due Diligence process has been invaluable, I would fully recommend them."

Mark Armitage

"Very friendly and efficient service - what a pleasure working with Anne."

Jacques Taylor

"I highly recommend Daniel from HHG Legal Mandurah. When dealing with a complicated legal property matter recently I was extremely impressed by Daniel's honesty and integrity and the legal advice I received. I am very happy with the service from HHG Legal."

Tony Walker

Select your location:

Please select your nearest office location so we can show you the most relevant information.