29 Jan 2015

Each family law property matter broadly involves a four step process:

 

  1.       The first step is to identify the assets and liabilities of the relationship, and to determine their

                value

  1. The second step is to identify the “contributions” of the parties.  Those contributions may be:

    – Financial (initially, during and after the relationship);

    – Non-financial contributions; and

    – Contributions to the welfare of the family, including contributions as homemaker or parent.

  2. The Court then assesses a range of additional factors (called “future needs” factors) under section 75(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 (“the Act”).  These factors take into account such matters as the age and state of health of each of the parties, physical and mental capacity of each of the parties for appropriate gainful employment, whether each party has superannuation and a range of other factors detailed under section 75(2) of the Act.  In other words, this section refers to the needs of each party, both now and in the future.

  3. The final step for the Court is to stand back and consider whether the proposed orders are “just and equitable” – that is whether they are fair to both parties in all the circumstances.

    Inheritances

    Inheritances are not necessarily included in the asset pool available for division (step 1) – a determining factor is timing. 

     

    Inheritances Received by a Party During the Marriage

    In general, inheritances received  by a party while still married are treated as a financial contribution to the joint assets made by the party who received the

    inheritance (provided of course that the inheritance was actually applied to the benefit of the parties) 

    Again, a material factor is timing.  Inheritances received at the beginning of the marriage may be categorised as initial financial contributions of the beneficiary spouse.  However, the impact of that initial contribution may be diminished by subsequent contributions over a long period – for example a party working for thirty years after the inheritance was received and paying off the mortgage in so doing.  Such initial contributions may therefore have little or no effect on the percentage division of the property pool in a long marriage.  The same principle applies to inheritances received early in a long marriage – say, in the first five years of a forty year marriage.  Depending upon the actual amount of that inheritance, it is likely that the subsequent 35 years of contributions will erode the significance of the inheritance received in the early years of the marriage.

    Inheritance monies that have been received and spent are not available for division because they no longer exist.  However, the fact (and benefit) of that inheritance may still be taken into account as a financial contribution made by the receiver of the inheritance.  This may have the effect of increasing the beneficiary’s percentage entitlement to existing property available for division.  That is, the beneficiary contributed more and therefore will leave the marriage with more – again, depending upon whether the inheriting party used the monies to benefit the parties.  If, for example, the inheriting party spent the monies on a round-the-world trip for themselves alone, that would not be a financial contribution made by them for the benefit of the parties.

    Inheritances Received by a Party Late in the Marriage

     

    Inheritances received late in the marriage or after separation will usually not be included in the assets of the parties.  The general approach of the court has been to have two asset pools – one being the matrimonial assets and liabilities, and the other being the inheritance monies (or property purchased with the inheritance monies) pool.  This two pool approach does not, however, mean that the inheritance falls into some kind of ‘protected category”. 

    A late inheritance may be quarantined in the hands of the beneficiary – if division of matrimonial property pool resulted in a fair settlement (step 4).  If the matrimonial property pool was too small to result in a fair and equitable settlement, then part or some of the inheritance pool may need to be included in the matrimonial property pool.

    Inheritances that come to light after separation, not yet received

    An inheritance after separation, but not yet received by the parties, is not property but a financial resource.  The practical effect of this is that the inheritance is not available for division.  However, the benefit of the inheritance is taken into account as a “future needs” factor (step 3).  The beneficiary spouse has a resource that they may draw upon to meet their future needs, whereas the non-beneficiary spouse does not.  The non-beneficiary spouse’s percentage of the divisible property pool (depending on the facts) may increase. 

     

    This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. If you would like further information in relation to this matter or other legal matters please contact our office on Freecall 1800 609 945 or email us now.

     

     

     

 

 

 

*This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. Please consult one of our experienced Legal Team for specific advice relevant to your situation.

100 years of Supporting West Australians

"Always fast and thorough service. Thank you"

Sitka Pil

My circumstances at the time I made contact with HHG were dire following my argument being rejected by two no win no fee firms. Following my initial meeting with HHG's employment law team I was left feeling extremely positive by the response and concern shown by HHG in regards to their support of my argument along with their preparedness to pursue an outcome on my behalf.

I accept the fact that nobody really wins in these cases (mental health/ workplace) however the end result was what would be considered most favourable and far in excess of what would have been achieved had I not sought the advice from HHG.

I have no hesitation in recommending HHG to anyone caught up in the messy circumstances I found myself in at the time.

Great advice and five-star commitment to their client!!"

Nathan Lynch

"Thank you for such great assistance with the transaction of Flying Domestics on behalf of Lorna Good. It has been such a pleasure to work with the HHG Legal Group and I look forward to working with you in the future."

Jim Goodwin

"Simon Creek and his team were at all times empathic, professional and confident.  My matter needed to be addressed within a pressing time frame, and their availability at short notice and contact after hours was much appreciated.  It caused me considerable stress, but having such a thoroughly reliable and competent team to call on helped me to feel in control. Although I hope not to need their services again in future, I would be confident in doing so!"

Dr Lana Bell

"A good outcome is what we can expect.  A great outcome is a sign of a company which does the very best for their clients. A very big thank you to Daniel Morris for showing empathy towards my small and much needed legal action.

To HHG Legal Group, thank you for a great outcome.  I would recommend your company to anyone seeking legal services."

Jan Atkinson

"Your support this morning was amazingly kind, not to mention your totally reassuring competence, knowledge and wisdom that you used on my behalf.  It was extremely reassuring to have your knowledgeable support, and I particularly appreciated your real and obvious kindness to me. It means so much at a very difficult time. I'm so grateful to you."

Family Law Client

"Janene was very professional and we established a good rapport quickly. The subject of death and wills can be quite confronting to deal with, however, Janene's approach was soft and accommodating."

Lynette Livesey

"A big thank you to HHG for their professional service, continued support, and wide range of legal knowledge. Our clients have given us nothing but kind words regarding HHG Legal Group and so we have no hesitation in referring and recommending Simon Creek and HHG Legal Group for their outstanding services and legal expertise."

Nigel Plowman, Director at McKinley Plowman & Associates

"Simon is a friendly and practical legal advisor. I have received great feedback from the clients I have referred to him and his team at HHG Legal Group."

Richard Beal, Director at BDO

"Over the last few years, I have been impressed by Simon’s legal ability, management skills, entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity and people skills. He appears to be that rare breed of lawyer – both knowledgeable and commercial."

Michael Malone, Founder of iiNet

"Our family has been a client of HHG Legal Group over many years.  Business has included drawing up of wills for three generations and preparing of probate for my father in law. I would have no hesitation in recommending HHG Legal Group to anyone requiring such services."

Bernice Climie

"You should be congratulated for the manner in which your staff address clients and we found our dealings with your company, once again a very pleasant experience and we would like to truly thank you for your efforts."

Steve Harvey and Jane Powell

"HHG Legal were absolutely fantastic. Extremely responsive and brought calm to our chaotic family situation through their knowledge and caring attitude. Extremely professional from our very first contact with them and they expertly guided our family though the required legal process over almost a 12 month period."

Amanda Williamson

"Fantastic team! They really care about their client. Tim Colcutt is a 'go that extra mile' guy who gives his client his all. I can't recommend HHG and Tim enough."

Kerry Samson

"I had a fantastic lawyer in Anne Hurley. She helped me out a great deal with good, sound advice in a friendly, professional manner. First class, thanks Anne"

Graeme Hammond

"Marine Plant Systems has been working with HHG Legal Group for a few years now and they continually provide first-class service. Their professional advice has been invaluable to our company."

Carolin Grimm - Marine Plant Systems

"We were kept up to date at all times. Pricing was always updated over the time period so we remained "in budget". Personal access to someone whenever I had questions. All in all a great experience without too much fuss."

Rosslyn Tasker - COO AltusQ Pty Ltd

"Good service you can count on."

Miles Lee

"HHG Legal Group has provided outstanding support as I have taken the journey of buying a business, their professionalism is beyond reproach. Their assistance throughout the Due Diligence process has been invaluable, I would fully recommend them."

Mark Armitage

"Very friendly and efficient service - what a pleasure working with Anne."

Jacques Taylor

"I highly recommend Daniel from HHG Legal Mandurah. When dealing with a complicated legal property matter recently I was extremely impressed by Daniel's honesty and integrity and the legal advice I received. I am very happy with the service from HHG Legal."

Tony Walker