27 Sep 2018

How many times have you bought something online, whether a retail product, a news service, a game or app, and been required to click your agreement to the “fine print”?  Have you ever actually read the fine print? Or have you ever accessed a site that says somewhere “continued use of this site constitutes agreement with the terms and conditions of use ….”  Have you ever cared about what you are agreeing to?

The ways in which we buy goods and services online is coming under increasing scrutiny. While our consumer protections laws have never been tougher, it has never been easier to give away your legal rights without ever knowing about it.  In late 2017, the Treasurer directed the ACCC to conduct a formal inquiry into digital platforms. While that inquiry focuses especially on the supply of news and media, the implications are significant for all e-commerce.

Murray Thornhill sat down with Dr Michael Schaper* from the ACCC …..

Murray Thornhill: To what extent are click-wrap agreements and e-commerce platforms being examined by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)?

Dr Michael Schaper: ACCC will consider customer contracts with digital platforms as part of the ACCC’s inquiry into Digital Platforms and this will include any so-called click-wrap agreements. Separately, it’s important to note that click-wrap agreements are already covered by the provisions of the Australian Consumer Law; in particular, prohibitions against misleading and deceptive conduct and unfair contract terms.

The Terms of Reference for the Digital Platforms Inquiry require the ACCC to examine the impact of digital search engines, social media platforms and other digital content aggregators (platform services), on the state of competition in media and advertising services markets; in particular, in relation to the supply of news and journalistic content, and the implications of this for media content creators, advertisers and consumers.

Matters that the ACCC will consider as part of the inquiry, but is not limited to, include:

  • The extent to which platform service providers are exercising market power in commercial dealings with the creators of journalistic content and advertisers;
  • The impact of platform service providers on the level of choice and quality of news and journalistic content to consumers;
  • The impact of platform service providers on media and advertising markets;
  • The impact of longer-term trends, including innovation and technological change on competition in media and advertising markets; and
  • The impact of information asymmetry between platform service providers, advertisers and consumers, and the effect on competition in media and advertising markets.

While the inquiry is not focused on the use of click-wrap agreements, click-wrap agreements are a significant consumer concern, and can be a feature of digital platforms.

Are any industries or areas of trade of more interest and relevance with respect to the use and terms of click-wrap contracts to the ACCC than others?

The ACCC’s priorities are set out in the Compliance and Enforcement Policy, which is released by the ACCC chairman in February each year. In addition to changing annual priorities, such as new car retailing and consumer issues related to broadband services, the ACCC has a list of enduring priorities around cartels, anti-competitive conduct, and issues that disproportionately impact vulnerable and disadvantaged consumers.

Click-wrap contracts don’t fall specifically into any one of the categories identified, but that doesn’t mean they won’t be a focus. The Digital Platforms Inquiry is revealing a number of issues including consumer concerns with the nature of their engagement with the platforms which will be looked at closely.

In what ways might consumers have difficulty with click-wrap agreements?

Click-wrap agreements have the potential to contravene the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, the legislation enforced by the ACCC. In particular, these agreements may lead to misleading or deceptive conduct in connection with the supply of goods or services.

Equally, the use of a click-wrap agreement might also hide from consumers or businesses, contract terms that are unfair within the meaning of the unfair contract terms prohibition under Australian Consumer Law.

In some situations, it could be argued that the use of a click-wrap agreement might be unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the ACL.

Click-wrap agreements can be used in high pressure transactions, where a consumer is looking to complete a transaction for goods and services and before they can proceed with the transaction they must agree to the terms and conditions of that transaction. Many consumers use mobile devices for these transactions and it is extremely difficult to read, comprehend and understand the ramifications of these terms and conditions at the best of times, let alone on a mobile device in a pressured environment. But as they are judged on a case-by-case basis, there is no hard and fast rule to apply.

Can the mere design of a click-wrap contract on a website (never mind the actual fine print) be misleading or likely to mislead?

It may depend on the design. If the design is misleading or deceptive there is little wiggle room: misleading and deceptive conduct is prohibited under Australian Consumer Law. The courts have interpreted misleading and deceptive conduct as conduct or representations that create a false impression to a consumer. A business that omits certain information or designs a click-wrap agreement to hide specific and relevant information from consumers is also misleading.

In this case, consumers can expect that a business that uses standard form agreements as part of its business model will prominently advise consumers of pertinent information that may cause harm or detriment to the consumer.

One of the features of click-wrap contracting and other forms of e-contracting, is the contrast between the complexity and level of detail in the contract, and the way the platform facilitates ease of entry into the bargain and lack of awareness of the terms. The vast majority of consumers (for example) will never read the fine print. To what extent does this create problems of interest to the ACCC?

This highlights a serious issue that goes to the heart of the current debate around privacy on online platforms. It’s an issue that is becoming increasingly prominent and is well and truly on the ACCC’s radar.

More generally, if businesses choose to rely on harsh and oppressive terms and conditions in standard form contracts, this may cause significant harm for consumers. In some instances, consumers may be able to use the prohibition against unfair contract terms to have unfair or unreasonable terms and conditions in these contracts set aside.

In these cases, the offending clauses in the contract no longer apply but the remainder of the contract (that is, the ‘not unfair’ part) remains valid.

But consumers should not rely on the courts striking down a section of a contract. This is where social media users can use the shared knowledge of the platform to protect themselves. There are many examples of companies that have had to rewrite their click-wrap agreements either because the groundswell of objections to how onerous they were or, as further evidence even companies don’t know what’s in them, they copied and pasted them from another source and they aren’t applicable in the new circumstances.

The ACCC and other regulators often advise consumers and businesses to be aware of, and understand any terms and conditions that apply to provision of goods and services.

Is it an area where greater regulation is being considered or may be considered?

The ACCC’s role is primarily to administer and enforce the Competition and Consumer Act. Questions of policy or increased regulation are for the government or relevant policy authorities. In the course of administering the CCA, the ACCC advises and makes recommendations to Government on the need for regulation, and inquiries such as the Digital Platforms Inquiry will lead to ACCC recommendations which may then be taken up by government.

*Dr Michael Schaper was Deputy Chair of the ACCC from July 2009 till 30 May 2018.

*This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. Please consult one of our experienced Legal Team for specific advice relevant to your situation.

100 years of Supporting West Australians

"Always fast and thorough service. Thank you"

Sitka Pil

My circumstances at the time I made contact with HHG were dire following my argument being rejected by two no win no fee firms. Following my initial meeting with HHG's employment law team I was left feeling extremely positive by the response and concern shown by HHG in regards to their support of my argument along with their preparedness to pursue an outcome on my behalf.

I accept the fact that nobody really wins in these cases (mental health/ workplace) however the end result was what would be considered most favourable and far in excess of what would have been achieved had I not sought the advice from HHG.

I have no hesitation in recommending HHG to anyone caught up in the messy circumstances I found myself in at the time.

Great advice and five-star commitment to their client!!"

Nathan Lynch

"Thank you for such great assistance with the transaction of Flying Domestics on behalf of Lorna Good. It has been such a pleasure to work with the HHG Legal Group and I look forward to working with you in the future."

Jim Goodwin

"Simon Creek and his team were at all times empathic, professional and confident.  My matter needed to be addressed within a pressing time frame, and their availability at short notice and contact after hours was much appreciated.  It caused me considerable stress, but having such a thoroughly reliable and competent team to call on helped me to feel in control. Although I hope not to need their services again in future, I would be confident in doing so!"

Dr Lana Bell

"A good outcome is what we can expect.  A great outcome is a sign of a company which does the very best for their clients. A very big thank you to Daniel Morris for showing empathy towards my small and much needed legal action.

To HHG Legal Group, thank you for a great outcome.  I would recommend your company to anyone seeking legal services."

Jan Atkinson

"Your support this morning was amazingly kind, not to mention your totally reassuring competence, knowledge and wisdom that you used on my behalf.  It was extremely reassuring to have your knowledgeable support, and I particularly appreciated your real and obvious kindness to me. It means so much at a very difficult time. I'm so grateful to you."

Family Law Client

"Janene was very professional and we established a good rapport quickly. The subject of death and wills can be quite confronting to deal with, however, Janene's approach was soft and accommodating."

Lynette Livesey

"A big thank you to HHG for their professional service, continued support, and wide range of legal knowledge. Our clients have given us nothing but kind words regarding HHG Legal Group and so we have no hesitation in referring and recommending Simon Creek and HHG Legal Group for their outstanding services and legal expertise."

Nigel Plowman, Director at McKinley Plowman & Associates

"Simon is a friendly and practical legal advisor. I have received great feedback from the clients I have referred to him and his team at HHG Legal Group."

Richard Beal, Director at BDO

"Over the last few years, I have been impressed by Simon’s legal ability, management skills, entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity and people skills. He appears to be that rare breed of lawyer – both knowledgeable and commercial."

Michael Malone, Founder of iiNet

"Our family has been a client of HHG Legal Group over many years.  Business has included drawing up of wills for three generations and preparing of probate for my father in law. I would have no hesitation in recommending HHG Legal Group to anyone requiring such services."

Bernice Climie

"You should be congratulated for the manner in which your staff address clients and we found our dealings with your company, once again a very pleasant experience and we would like to truly thank you for your efforts."

Steve Harvey and Jane Powell

"HHG Legal were absolutely fantastic. Extremely responsive and brought calm to our chaotic family situation through their knowledge and caring attitude. Extremely professional from our very first contact with them and they expertly guided our family though the required legal process over almost a 12 month period."

Amanda Williamson

"Fantastic team! They really care about their client. Tim Colcutt is a 'go that extra mile' guy who gives his client his all. I can't recommend HHG and Tim enough."

Kerry Samson

"I had a fantastic lawyer in Anne Hurley. She helped me out a great deal with good, sound advice in a friendly, professional manner. First class, thanks Anne"

Graeme Hammond

"Marine Plant Systems has been working with HHG Legal Group for a few years now and they continually provide first-class service. Their professional advice has been invaluable to our company."

Carolin Grimm - Marine Plant Systems

"We were kept up to date at all times. Pricing was always updated over the time period so we remained "in budget". Personal access to someone whenever I had questions. All in all a great experience without too much fuss."

Rosslyn Tasker - COO AltusQ Pty Ltd

"Good service you can count on."

Miles Lee

"HHG Legal Group has provided outstanding support as I have taken the journey of buying a business, their professionalism is beyond reproach. Their assistance throughout the Due Diligence process has been invaluable, I would fully recommend them."

Mark Armitage

"Very friendly and efficient service - what a pleasure working with Anne."

Jacques Taylor

"I highly recommend Daniel from HHG Legal Mandurah. When dealing with a complicated legal property matter recently I was extremely impressed by Daniel's honesty and integrity and the legal advice I received. I am very happy with the service from HHG Legal."

Tony Walker