30 Jun 2017

With email communication becoming the most commonly used means by parties to negotiate commercial and other agreements, it is important that everyone who communicates electronically is aware of potential legal implications of doing so.

Those of us who use email as part of business negotiations and transactions should take note of recent Australian cases where courts have held that negotiations via email created binding agreements, despite the lack of a formal agreement. These cases suggest an increasing trend in the willingness of Australian courts to find legally binding agreements in email correspondence. This article provides a summary of the rulings in those cases and some practical tips to keep in mind when engaging in commercial negotiations by email.

What Will a Court Look For?

In assessing whether or not the parties have entered into a legally binding agreement, courts will look objectively at the broader context of communications between the parties and the intention of the parties, including:

  • whether the parties reached some finality as to the terms of the agreement in their negotiations;

  • whether there is any indication that the parties intended to be legally bound immediately and exclusively by the negotiated terms; and

  • whether there was reference to a formal contract and the intention to sign one;

Recent Australian Cases

Vantage Systems Pty Ltd v Priolo Corporation Pty Ltd [2015] WASCA 21 (‘Vantage Systems’)

In Vantage Systems, the issue was whether Priolo as lessor and Vantage as lessee had entered into a binding agreement by email to lease West Perth office premises, despite there being no formal lease documentation.

Nearing the expiry of the extended term of the lease, Priolo’s property agent and Vantage’s finance manager engaged in discussions about the possibility of entering into a new lease of the premises. Priolo’s agent sent Vantage a proposal for a new lease and this was followed by a series of emails negotiating the proposed terms of the new lease. A revised lease proposal was later sent by Priolo’s agent to Vantage. After receiving the revised lease proposal, Vantage emailed that they were ‘happy with the terms of the proposal’ and that Vantage’s sub-tenant had ‘approved the terms as well’, with further instructions to Priolo’s agent to ‘proceed with wrapping [the new lease] up’.

Following these negotiations, a draft lease was prepared and sent to Vantage and its subtenant for review. Both Vantage and its subtenant had issues with the terms of the draft lease and, despite attempts by the parties to resolve those issues, both tenant and sub-tenant attempted to assert their right to vacate the premises on the basis that there was no binding agreement to enter into the lease. Priolo argued that the emails relating to acceptance of the lease proposal constituted a binding agreement.

The Western Australian Supreme Court of Appeal held that on Vantage accepting the revised proposal the parties intended:

  • to be bound immediately and exclusively by the revised lease proposal (and any implied terms); and

  • that a formal lease agreement would be executed, incorporating the terms agreed to in the revised proposal, and any additional negotiated terms.

On the Court’s objective assessment of the state of affairs between the parties, Vantage’s acceptance by email of the revised lease proposal was sufficient for there to be a legally binding agreement.

Stellard Pty Ltd & Anor v North Queensland Fuel Pty Ltd [2015] QSC 119 (‘Stellard’)

This case involved an email exchange between the agents of the defendant-vendor (North Queensland Fuel) and the plaintiff-buyer (Stellard) in relation to the sale of land where a roadhouse was located in Queensland. The buyers claimed that a contract for the sale of the roadhouse was constituted by email exchange.

The buyer wanted to make an offer for the vendor’s land marketed for sale, so it requested the terms of sale from the vendor. The seller replied with an email attaching a draft contract of sale and setting out the seller’s conditions for signing the contract. The buyer confirmed its offer by email, stating that it was ‘subject to contract and due diligence as previously discussed’, and requesting acceptance of the offer with a view to exchanging the contract ‘next Monday’. Shortly after, the vendor emailed back saying ‘we accept the below offer which we understand will be subject to the execution of the Contract provided (with agreed amendments) on Monday’.

A few days later, the vendor received a higher offer from another party. The vendor notified the buyer that it was terminating the negotiations on the basis that the latest draft contract did not contain a particular condition which was contained in the original draft contract. The buyer argued that the email exchange with the seller constituted a ‘valid and binding agreement’.

The Queensland Supreme Court held that a legally binding contract had been entered into by the parties. This was despite the seller expressing that it accepted the buyer’s offer subject to execution of a formal contract. In the context of the emails between the parties and the expressions used in them, the Court found a strong suggestion that the parties wanted to be bound immediately and exclusively by the terms which they had agreed upon, with the expectation that any additional terms would be included in a further contract.

Practical Tips

Whether negotiations by email with constitute a legally binding agreement will depend on how a court will assess the broader context of the communications and the objective intentions of the parties. There are no foolproof measures, but the following steps can be taken to reduce the risk of creating a legally binding agreement:

  • treat all email and other electronic correspondence with the same caution and precision that you would a formal document. This includes the use of legal terms such as ‘offer’ and ‘acceptance’.

  • in email negotiations, clearly and consistently state that there is no legally binding agreement until the final terms have been agreed to and a formal contract has been executed.

Email provides us with the benefit of instantaneous and reliable written communication. However, for those of us who regularly use email in commercial negotiations and transactions, it is important that we are aware that the words that we hurriedly punch out on our keyboard may have legal implications and lasting consequences.

This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. If you would like further information in relation to this matter or other legal matters please contact our office on Freecall 1800 609 945 or email us now.

*This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. Please consult one of our experienced Legal Team for specific advice relevant to your situation.

100 years of Supporting West Australians

"Always fast and thorough service. Thank you"

Sitka Pil

My circumstances at the time I made contact with HHG were dire following my argument being rejected by two no win no fee firms. Following my initial meeting with HHG's employment law team I was left feeling extremely positive by the response and concern shown by HHG in regards to their support of my argument along with their preparedness to pursue an outcome on my behalf.

I accept the fact that nobody really wins in these cases (mental health/ workplace) however the end result was what would be considered most favourable and far in excess of what would have been achieved had I not sought the advice from HHG.

I have no hesitation in recommending HHG to anyone caught up in the messy circumstances I found myself in at the time.

Great advice and five-star commitment to their client!!"

Nathan Lynch

"Thank you for such great assistance with the transaction of Flying Domestics on behalf of Lorna Good. It has been such a pleasure to work with the HHG Legal Group and I look forward to working with you in the future."

Jim Goodwin

"Simon Creek and his team were at all times empathic, professional and confident.  My matter needed to be addressed within a pressing time frame, and their availability at short notice and contact after hours was much appreciated.  It caused me considerable stress, but having such a thoroughly reliable and competent team to call on helped me to feel in control. Although I hope not to need their services again in future, I would be confident in doing so!"

Dr Lana Bell

"A good outcome is what we can expect.  A great outcome is a sign of a company which does the very best for their clients. A very big thank you to Daniel Morris for showing empathy towards my small and much needed legal action.

To HHG Legal Group, thank you for a great outcome.  I would recommend your company to anyone seeking legal services."

Jan Atkinson

"Your support this morning was amazingly kind, not to mention your totally reassuring competence, knowledge and wisdom that you used on my behalf.  It was extremely reassuring to have your knowledgeable support, and I particularly appreciated your real and obvious kindness to me. It means so much at a very difficult time. I'm so grateful to you."

Family Law Client

"Janene was very professional and we established a good rapport quickly. The subject of death and wills can be quite confronting to deal with, however, Janene's approach was soft and accommodating."

Lynette Livesey

"A big thank you to HHG for their professional service, continued support, and wide range of legal knowledge. Our clients have given us nothing but kind words regarding HHG Legal Group and so we have no hesitation in referring and recommending Simon Creek and HHG Legal Group for their outstanding services and legal expertise."

Nigel Plowman, Director at McKinley Plowman & Associates

"Simon is a friendly and practical legal advisor. I have received great feedback from the clients I have referred to him and his team at HHG Legal Group."

Richard Beal, Director at BDO

"Over the last few years, I have been impressed by Simon’s legal ability, management skills, entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity and people skills. He appears to be that rare breed of lawyer – both knowledgeable and commercial."

Michael Malone, Founder of iiNet

"Our family has been a client of HHG Legal Group over many years.  Business has included drawing up of wills for three generations and preparing of probate for my father in law. I would have no hesitation in recommending HHG Legal Group to anyone requiring such services."

Bernice Climie

"You should be congratulated for the manner in which your staff address clients and we found our dealings with your company, once again a very pleasant experience and we would like to truly thank you for your efforts."

Steve Harvey and Jane Powell

"HHG Legal were absolutely fantastic. Extremely responsive and brought calm to our chaotic family situation through their knowledge and caring attitude. Extremely professional from our very first contact with them and they expertly guided our family though the required legal process over almost a 12 month period."

Amanda Williamson

"Fantastic team! They really care about their client. Tim Colcutt is a 'go that extra mile' guy who gives his client his all. I can't recommend HHG and Tim enough."

Kerry Samson

"I had a fantastic lawyer in Anne Hurley. She helped me out a great deal with good, sound advice in a friendly, professional manner. First class, thanks Anne"

Graeme Hammond

"Marine Plant Systems has been working with HHG Legal Group for a few years now and they continually provide first-class service. Their professional advice has been invaluable to our company."

Carolin Grimm - Marine Plant Systems

"We were kept up to date at all times. Pricing was always updated over the time period so we remained "in budget". Personal access to someone whenever I had questions. All in all a great experience without too much fuss."

Rosslyn Tasker - COO AltusQ Pty Ltd

"Good service you can count on."

Miles Lee

"HHG Legal Group has provided outstanding support as I have taken the journey of buying a business, their professionalism is beyond reproach. Their assistance throughout the Due Diligence process has been invaluable, I would fully recommend them."

Mark Armitage

"Very friendly and efficient service - what a pleasure working with Anne."

Jacques Taylor

"I highly recommend Daniel from HHG Legal Mandurah. When dealing with a complicated legal property matter recently I was extremely impressed by Daniel's honesty and integrity and the legal advice I received. I am very happy with the service from HHG Legal."

Tony Walker