Your selected location:
3 Apr 2017

Since 12 November 2016, small businesses can apply to courts under the Australasian Consumer Law (“ACL”) to set aside or amend unfair contract terms.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (‘ACCC’) also has the power to make these applications on behalf of both small businesses and consumers.

The ACCC has set its priorities for 2017 by focusing on (amongst other areas), unfair contract terms in the construction sector.

HHG Legal Group has considered what kinds of terms commonly found in construction contracts might now be set aside or amended as being unfair. We have identified the following six kinds of terms as likely candidates:

1. Termination for convenience without reciprocal compensation or notice

A contractor typically has to spend a lot of time and money tendering for and then mobilising to commence a construction project. For a principal or head contractor to take the benefit of that expenditure of time and money and then simply to dismiss the contractor from site, without reasonable cause, compensation or notice, would, in our view, very likely attract the court’s censure. An exception might be where the principal or head contractor seeking to rely on a termination for convenience clause can show that an appropriate premium was built into the contract price, to cover, or at least to compensate the contractor for, the risks associated with sudden termination of its contract.

2. Time bars that do not reasonably reflect upward obligations

Time and again, and as recently as last year, the courts have reaffirmed the importance and reasonableness of time bars under construction contracts, with respect to extension of time and price variation claims. The rationale is that in a typical contractual chain, each party will have a reciprocal obligation to notify the party above it, of an event that is likely to delay the progress of works or cause those works to cost more money. Unless such notice is given in a timely manner at each point in the contractual chain, the owner/principal may suffer substantial losses, for failure to meet its own commercial commitments to third parties.

Having said this, we consider that a court is now likely to investigate more carefully whether the actual time bar at each point in the contractual chain is reasonably set having regard to the obligations of those parties who sit above the time-barred contractor.

For example, if a sub-sub-contractor’s sub-contracting employer has 10 days to notify of a delay event, then it may be considered reasonable to give the sub-sub-contractor only five days to give that notice to the sub-contractor. However, if a sub-contractor is only given seven days to notify the head contractor of a delay event which the head contractor, under its own contract, has 28 days to notify to the owner, we expect that the time bar may be more likely to be set aside or amended as unfair.

3. Prior works liabilities

We expect it to become more difficult in most cases for a contractor to justify to a court, why it would hold a sub-contractor liable to rectify or to compensate for a defect in works that were undertaken by another sub-contractor, prior to the liable sub-contractor’s commencement of their own works. In other words, if you did not do the defective work yourself, why should you be exposed to liability for their defective state? Despite the inherent unfairness in imposing such a requirement on sub-contractors in most circumstances, this kind of provision sometimes appears in sub-contracts for major works.


4. Bad progress payment profiles

The rates of progress payments should in general reasonably reflect the proportion of total expenditure that the contractor expects to incur, at each point in the life of the project. For example, if the contractor expects to incur 20% of the total cost of the project in the first stage of its works, then its progress payment should be set at around 20% of the total contract price (with some flexibility, of course). In that case, if, for example, the contract provides for only 5% of the total contract price to be paid on account of the first progress claim, then we expect this may, in some cases, be considered to be an unfair contract term, which a court may amend, to reflect more accurately the contractor’s proportional expenditure.

5. Unnecessarily complex notice provisions

The courts have consistently regarded it as reasonable to require a contractor, to provide information that is reasonably necessary to enable the parties sitting above them in the contractual chain, to make certain adjustments and decisions based on that information. However, if a construction contract imposes an obligation on a contractor to notify facts or circumstances that do not appear necessary to enable those that sit above the contractor to make relevant decisions or adjustments, then this may be regarded as unfair.


6. Unfair exclusions of liability

Finally, if your contract unreasonably excludes your entitlement to take action against your head contractor or principal for disruption or prolongation of your works, where this has resulted from the head contractor’s failure, for example, to manage the site or the project properly, we expect that in some cases, this will be considered unfair.

 

7.Conclusion

The extent of a court’s power under the ACL to set aside or amend unfair provisions of standard form contracts is still uncertain.

What is known, however, is that the ACCC has given priority to certain kinds of standard form contract and that construction contracts are amongst those given priority.

Construction contractors should be mindful of this when negotiating their contract terms. If necessary, contractors should report any provision which considered to be unfair, to the ACCC. We have flagged the above six kinds of provision as likely at least in some circumstances to be treated by a court as ‘unfair’ for the purposes of the ACL but there may be others.

If you consider that a contract which has been offered to you as a construction contractor is, or may be, unfair, contact HHG Legal Group’s experienced construction law team on (08) 9322 1966.

*This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. Please consult one of our experienced Legal Team for specific advice relevant to your situation.

Supporting Western Australian's for more than 100 years

"Always fast and thorough service. Thank you"

Sitka Pil

My circumstances at the time I made contact with HHG were dire following my argument being rejected by two no win no fee firms. Following my initial meeting with HHG's employment law team I was left feeling extremely positive by the response and concern shown by HHG in regards to their support of my argument along with their preparedness to pursue an outcome on my behalf.

I accept the fact that nobody really wins in these cases (mental health/ workplace) however the end result was what would be considered most favourable and far in excess of what would have been achieved had I not sought the advice from HHG.

I have no hesitation in recommending HHG to anyone caught up in the messy circumstances I found myself in at the time.

Great advice and five-star commitment to their client!!"

Nathan Lynch

"Thank you for such great assistance with the transaction of Flying Domestics on behalf of Lorna Good. It has been such a pleasure to work with the HHG Legal Group and I look forward to working with you in the future."

Jim Goodwin

"Simon Creek and his team were at all times empathic, professional and confident.  My matter needed to be addressed within a pressing time frame, and their availability at short notice and contact after hours was much appreciated.  It caused me considerable stress, but having such a thoroughly reliable and competent team to call on helped me to feel in control. Although I hope not to need their services again in future, I would be confident in doing so!"

Dr Lana Bell

"A good outcome is what we can expect.  A great outcome is a sign of a company which does the very best for their clients. A very big thank you to Daniel Morris for showing empathy towards my small and much needed legal action.

To HHG Legal Group, thank you for a great outcome.  I would recommend your company to anyone seeking legal services."

Jan Atkinson

"Your support this morning was amazingly kind, not to mention your totally reassuring competence, knowledge and wisdom that you used on my behalf.  It was extremely reassuring to have your knowledgeable support, and I particularly appreciated your real and obvious kindness to me. It means so much at a very difficult time. I'm so grateful to you."

Family Law Client

"Janene was very professional and we established a good rapport quickly. The subject of death and wills can be quite confronting to deal with, however, Janene's approach was soft and accommodating."

Lynette Livesey

"A big thank you to HHG for their professional service, continued support, and wide range of legal knowledge. Our clients have given us nothing but kind words regarding HHG Legal Group and so we have no hesitation in referring and recommending Simon Creek and HHG Legal Group for their outstanding services and legal expertise."

Nigel Plowman, Director at McKinley Plowman & Associates

"Simon is a friendly and practical legal advisor. I have received great feedback from the clients I have referred to him and his team at HHG Legal Group."

Richard Beal, Director at BDO

"Over the last few years, I have been impressed by Simon’s legal ability, management skills, entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity and people skills. He appears to be that rare breed of lawyer – both knowledgeable and commercial."

Michael Malone, Founder of iiNet

"Our family has been a client of HHG Legal Group over many years.  Business has included drawing up of wills for three generations and preparing of probate for my father in law. I would have no hesitation in recommending HHG Legal Group to anyone requiring such services."

Bernice Climie

"You should be congratulated for the manner in which your staff address clients and we found our dealings with your company, once again a very pleasant experience and we would like to truly thank you for your efforts."

Steve Harvey and Jane Powell

"HHG Legal were absolutely fantastic. Extremely responsive and brought calm to our chaotic family situation through their knowledge and caring attitude. Extremely professional from our very first contact with them and they expertly guided our family though the required legal process over almost a 12 month period."

Amanda Williamson

"Fantastic team! They really care about their client. Tim Colcutt is a 'go that extra mile' guy who gives his client his all. I can't recommend HHG and Tim enough."

Kerry Samson

"I had a fantastic lawyer in Anne Hurley. She helped me out a great deal with good, sound advice in a friendly, professional manner. First class, thanks Anne"

Graeme Hammond

"Marine Plant Systems has been working with HHG Legal Group for a few years now and they continually provide first-class service. Their professional advice has been invaluable to our company."

Carolin Grimm - Marine Plant Systems

"We were kept up to date at all times. Pricing was always updated over the time period so we remained "in budget". Personal access to someone whenever I had questions. All in all a great experience without too much fuss."

Rosslyn Tasker - COO AltusQ Pty Ltd

"Good service you can count on."

Miles Lee

"HHG Legal Group has provided outstanding support as I have taken the journey of buying a business, their professionalism is beyond reproach. Their assistance throughout the Due Diligence process has been invaluable, I would fully recommend them."

Mark Armitage

"Very friendly and efficient service - what a pleasure working with Anne."

Jacques Taylor

"I highly recommend Daniel from HHG Legal Mandurah. When dealing with a complicated legal property matter recently I was extremely impressed by Daniel's honesty and integrity and the legal advice I received. I am very happy with the service from HHG Legal."

Tony Walker

Select your location:

Please select your nearest office location so we can show you the most relevant information.